Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1318
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSturm, Jonathanen
dc.contributor.otherSrikanth, V.K.en
dc.contributor.otherThrift, A.G.en
dc.contributor.otherFryer, J.L.en
dc.contributor.otherSaling, M.M.en
dc.contributor.otherDewey, H.M.en
dc.contributor.otherDonnan, G.A.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-27T01:02:23Zen
dc.date.available2019-03-27T01:02:23Zen
dc.date.issued2006-06en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 18, Issue 2, pp. 295 - 305en
dc.identifier.issn1041-6102en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1318en
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Brief cognitive tests such as the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) have been used to detect cognitive impairment and dementia in studies of stroke patients. However, there are few data on their validity for such use. We have evaluated their validity in detecting cognitive impairment not dementia (CIND) and dementia in a community-based sample of first-ever stroke patients. METHODS: The standardized MMSE (S-MMSE) and the 16-item IQCODE were administered to 79 patients 1 year after a first-ever stroke. CIND and dementia were diagnosed independently using a comprehensive cognitive battery. The performances of the two tests were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Combined performance was evaluated when their scores were used in parallel (the "or rule"), in series (the "and rule") or as a weighted sum (the "weighted sum rule"). RESULTS: Both tests were extremely poor at detecting CIND individually and in combination. For dementia, at traditional cut-points, the S-MMSE (< or =23) was insensitive (0.50, 95% CI 0.16-0.84) and the IQCODE (> or =3.30) nonspecific (0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.75). An acceptable balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved for dementia using the "or rule" combination, but with only modest positive predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The S-MMSE and the IQCODE were individually poor at detecting CIND and dementia after a nonaphasic first-ever stroke. The combination was useful in detecting dementia but it does not replace the need for detailed neuropsychological tests.en
dc.subjectNeurologyen
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.titleThe validity of brief screening cognitive instruments in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia after first-ever strokeen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1041610205002711en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16734921en
dc.identifier.journaltitleInt Psychogeriatricsen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Neurology
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Mar 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.