Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1597
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Martin-
dc.contributor.otherChambers, S.K.-
dc.contributor.otherOcchipinti, S.-
dc.contributor.otherFoley, E.-
dc.contributor.otherClutton, S.-
dc.contributor.otherLegg, M.-
dc.contributor.otherStockler, M.R.-
dc.contributor.otherFrydenberg, M.-
dc.contributor.otherGardiner, R.A.-
dc.contributor.otherLepore, S.J.-
dc.contributor.otherDavis, I.D.-
dc.contributor.otherSmith, D.P.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T03:46:35Zen
dc.date.available2019-08-23T03:46:35Zen
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.citation35(3):291-297en
dc.identifier.issn0732-183xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1597en
dc.description.abstractPurpose Advanced prostate cancer (PC) is associated with substantial psychosocial morbidity. We sought to determine whether mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) reduces distress in men with advanced PC. Methods Men with advanced PC (proven metastatic and/or castration-resistant biochemical progression) were randomly assigned to an 8-week, group-based MBCT intervention delivered by telephone (n = 94) or to minimally enhanced usual care (n = 95). Primary intervention outcomes were psychological distress, cancer-specific distress, and prostate-specific antigen anxiety. Mindfulness skills were assessed as potential mediators of effect. Participants were assessed at baseline and were followed up at 3, 6, and 9 months. Main statistical analyses were conducted on the basis of intention to treat. Results Fourteen MBCT groups were conducted in the intervention arm. Facilitator adherence ratings were high (> 93%). Using random-effects mixed-regression models, intention-to-treat analyses indicated no significant changes in intervention outcomes or in engagement with mindfulness for men in MBCT compared with those receiving minimally enhanced usual care. Per-protocol analyses also found no differences between arms in outcomes or engagement, with the exception of the mindfulness skill of observing, which increased over time for men in MBCT compared with usual care ( P = .032). Conclusion MBCT in this format was not more effective than minimally enhanced usual care in reducing distress in men with advanced PC. Future intervention research for these men should consider approaches that map more closely to masculinity.en
dc.description.sponsorshipRadiation Oncologyen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectComplementary Therapiesen
dc.titleMindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trialen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/jco.2016.68.8788en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27870567en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Clinical Oncologyen
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

118
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.