Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1640
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurnion, Bridin-
dc.contributor.otherStockings, E.-
dc.contributor.otherCampbell, G.-
dc.contributor.otherHall, W.D.-
dc.contributor.otherNielsen, S.-
dc.contributor.otherZagic, D.-
dc.contributor.otherRahman, R.-
dc.contributor.otherFarrell, M.-
dc.contributor.otherWeier, M.-
dc.contributor.otherDegenhardt, L.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T04:12:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-26T04:12:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-
dc.identifier.citation159(10):1932-1954en
dc.identifier.issn0304-3959en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1640-
dc.description.abstractThis review examines evidence for the effectiveness of cannabinoids in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) and addresses gaps in the literature by: considering differences in outcomes based on cannabinoid type and specific CNCP condition; including all study designs; and following IMMPACT guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched in July 2017. Analyses were conducted using Revman 5.3 and Stata 15.0. A total of 91 publications containing 104 studies were eligible (n = 9958 participants), including 47 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 57 observational studies. Forty-eight studies examined neuropathic pain, 7 studies examined fibromyalgia, 1 rheumatoid arthritis, and 48 other CNCP (13 multiple sclerosis-related pain, 6 visceral pain, and 29 samples with mixed or undefined CNCP). Across RCTs, pooled event rates (PERs) for 30% reduction in pain were 29.0% (cannabinoids) vs 25.9% (placebo); significant effect for cannabinoids was found; number needed to treat to benefit was 24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15-61); for 50% reduction in pain, PERs were 18.2% vs 14.4%; no significant difference was observed. Pooled change in pain intensity (standardised mean difference: -0.14, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.08) was equivalent to a 3 mm reduction on a 100 mm visual analogue scale greater than placebo groups. In RCTs, PERs for all-cause adverse events were 81.2% vs 66.2%; number needed to treat to harm: 6 (95% CI 5-8). There were no significant impacts on physical or emotional functioning, and low-quality evidence of improved sleep and patient global impression of change. Evidence for effectiveness of cannabinoids in CNCP is limited. Effects suggest that number needed to treat to benefit is high, and number needed to treat to harm is low, with limited impact on other domains. It seems unlikely that cannabinoids are highly effective medicines for CNCP.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDrug & Alcoholen
dc.subjectDrug and Alcoholen
dc.subjectDrug Therapyen
dc.titleCannabis and cannabinoids for the treatment of people with chronic noncancer pain conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and observational studiesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001293en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29847469en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.identifier.journaltitlePainen
dc.type.studyortrialReviews/Systematic Reviewsen
dc.relation.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-3025en
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

80
checked on Nov 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.