Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1673
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Peter R-
dc.contributor.otherBlinkhorn, A.S.-
dc.contributor.otherByun, R.-
dc.contributor.otherJohnson, G.-
dc.contributor.otherMetha, P.-
dc.contributor.otherKay, Meredith-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-01T05:33:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-01T05:33:43Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-
dc.identifier.citationVolume 15, Article No. 9en
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1673-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Local Government Area of Gosford implemented a water fluoridation scheme in 2008. Therefore the opportunity was taken to record the dental health of primary school children aged 5-7 years prior to the fluoridation and compare the results with other communities in NSW with different access to fluoridated water. The aim was to compare the oral health of New South Wales (Australia)s 5-7 year olds living in fluoridated, and non- fluoridated communities. One of the areas was due to implement water fluoridation and is termed the pre-fluoridation site. METHODS: Pupils in the first year of Public and Catholic Schools in three areas of NSW were recruited. Class lists were used to draw a sample of approximately 900 per area. This number allowed for a non-response rate of up to 30 per cent and would give a sample sufficient numbers to allow statistical inferences to be drawn. Children whose parents consented received a dental examination and the clinical data was collected on mark sense cards. RESULTS: In the 3 areas the proportion of children who received a dental examination varied; 77.5% (n = 825) for the fluoridated area, 80.1% (n = 781) for the pre-fluoridated area and 55.3% (n = 523) for the non-fluoridated area. The mean dmft was 1.40 for the fluoridated area, 2.02 for the pre-fluoridated area and 2.09 for the non-fluoridated area. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Differences were also noted in the proportion of children who were caries free, 62.6% fluoridated area, 50.8% for the pre-fluoride area and 48.6% for the non-fluoride location. CONCLUSION: The children living in the well-established fluoridated area had less dental caries and a higher proportion free from disease when compared with the other two areas which were not fluoridated. Fluoridation demonstrated a clear benefit in terms of better oral health for young children.en
dc.description.sponsorshipPublic Healthen
dc.subjectPublic Healthen
dc.subjectPediatricsen
dc.subjectPaediatricsen
dc.titleThe Dental Health of primary school children living in fluoridated, pre-fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6831-15-9en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25604625en
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC Oral Healthen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Public Health / Health Promotion
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

112
checked on Jan 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.