Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1/1722
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zwan, Benjamin | - |
dc.contributor.other | Miri, N. | - |
dc.contributor.other | Lehmann, J. | - |
dc.contributor.other | Legge, K. | - |
dc.contributor.other | Vial, P. | - |
dc.contributor.other | Greer, P.B. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-06T23:49:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-06T23:49:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 4:26-31 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2405-6316 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1722 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Purpose: Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) can be used to reconstruct dose inside a virtual phantom. This work aims to study the feasibility of using this method for remote dosimetry auditing of clinical trials. Materials and Methods: Six centres participated in an intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) pilot study of this new audit approach. Each centre produced a head and neck (HN) and post-prostatectomy (PP) trial plan and transferred the plans to virtual phantoms to calculate a reference dose distribution. They acquired in-air images of the treatment fields along with calibration images using their EPID. These data were sent to the central site where the images were converted to 2D field-byfield doses in a flat virtual water phantom and to 3D combined field doses in a cylindrical virtual phantom for comparison with corresponding reference dose distributions. Additional test images were used to assess the accuracy of the method when using different EPIDs. Results: Field-by-field 2D analysis yielded mean gamma pass-rates of 99.6% ( ± 0.3%) and 99.6% ( ± 0.6%) for HN and PP plans respectively (3%/3 mm, doses greater than 10% global max). 3D combined field analysis gave mean pass-rates of 97.9% ( ± 2.6%) and 97.9% ( ± 1.8%) for the HN and PP plans. Dosimetry tests revealed some field size limitations of the EPIDs. Conclusions: The remote auditing methodology using EPIDs is feasible and potentially an inexpensive method. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Central Coast Cancer Centre | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631617300246 | en |
dc.subject | Radiotherapy | en |
dc.subject | Cancer | en |
dc.title | Remote dosimetric auditing for intensity modulated radiotherapy: A pilot study | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2017.11.004 | en |
dc.description.affiliates | Central Coast Local Health District | en |
dc.description.affiliates | Gosford Hospital | en |
dc.description.affiliates | The University of Newcastle | en |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology | en |
dc.originaltype | Text | en |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Medical Physics | - |
Appears in Collections: | Health Service Research |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.