Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1722
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZwan, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.otherMiri, N.-
dc.contributor.otherLehmann, J.-
dc.contributor.otherLegge, K.-
dc.contributor.otherVial, P.-
dc.contributor.otherGreer, P.B.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-06T23:49:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-06T23:49:49Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-
dc.identifier.citation4:26-31en
dc.identifier.issn2405-6316en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1722-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) can be used to reconstruct dose inside a virtual phantom. This work aims to study the feasibility of using this method for remote dosimetry auditing of clinical trials. Materials and Methods: Six centres participated in an intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) pilot study of this new audit approach. Each centre produced a head and neck (HN) and post-prostatectomy (PP) trial plan and transferred the plans to virtual phantoms to calculate a reference dose distribution. They acquired in-air images of the treatment fields along with calibration images using their EPID. These data were sent to the central site where the images were converted to 2D field-byfield doses in a flat virtual water phantom and to 3D combined field doses in a cylindrical virtual phantom for comparison with corresponding reference dose distributions. Additional test images were used to assess the accuracy of the method when using different EPIDs. Results: Field-by-field 2D analysis yielded mean gamma pass-rates of 99.6% ( ± 0.3%) and 99.6% ( ± 0.6%) for HN and PP plans respectively (3%/3 mm, doses greater than 10% global max). 3D combined field analysis gave mean pass-rates of 97.9% ( ± 2.6%) and 97.9% ( ± 1.8%) for the HN and PP plans. Dosimetry tests revealed some field size limitations of the EPIDs. Conclusions: The remote auditing methodology using EPIDs is feasible and potentially an inexpensive method.en
dc.description.sponsorshipCentral Coast Cancer Centreen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631617300246en
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.titleRemote dosimetric auditing for intensity modulated radiotherapy: A pilot studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2017.11.004en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.description.affiliatesThe University of Newcastleen
dc.identifier.journaltitlePhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncologyen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptMedical Physics-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.