Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2030
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Tomiko-
dc.contributor.authorCleasby, Peter A-
dc.contributor.otherJeong, S.-
dc.contributor.otherOhr, S.O.-
dc.contributor.otherDavey, R.-
dc.contributor.otherOldmeadow, C.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-07T01:20:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-07T01:20:23Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-01-
dc.identifier.citation21(1):901en
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/2030-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) has emerged to improve end-of-life processes and experiences. However, the available evidence presents the gloomy picture of increasing number of older people living with chronic diseases and the mismatch between their preferences for and the actual place of death. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of normalisation of an Advance Care Planning (NACP) service delivered by specially trained Registered Nurses (RNs) in hospital and community settings. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted involving 16 sites (eight hospital and eight community sites) in Australia. Patients who were aged ≥18 years, who had at least one of nine chronic conditions, and who did not have an Advance Care Directive (ACD) were offered the NACP service. ACP was normalised as part of routine service on admission. The intervention, NACP, was a series of facilitated conversations about the components of ACP. The primary outcomes which included the completion of ACDs, and/or appointment of an Enduring Guardian (EG), were assessed in both intervention and control sites at pre and post intervention stages. Numbers of patients who completed an ACD or appointed an EG were described by count (percentage). ACD completion was compared between intervention and control sites using a logistic mixed effects regression model. The model includes fixed effects for treatment group, period, and their interaction, as well as random site level intercepts. Secondary model included potentially confounding variables as covariates, including age, sex and chronic diseases. RESULTS: The prevalence of legally binding ACDs in intervention sites has increased from five to 85 (from 0.85% in pre to 17.6% in post), whereas it has slightly decreased from five to 2 (from 1.2% in pre and to 0.49% in post) in control sites (the difference in these changes being statistically significant p < 0.001). ACD completion rate was 3.6% (n = 4) in LHD1 and 1.2% (n = 3) in LHD2 in hospital whereas it was 53% (n = 26) in LHD1 and 80% (n = 52) in LHD2 in community. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that NACP service delivered by ACP RNs was effective in increasing completion of ACDs (interaction odds ratio = 50) and was more effective in community than hospital settings. Involvement of various healthcare professionals are warranted to ensure concordance of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618001627246 ) on 03/10/2018. The URL of the trial registry record http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial/MyTrial.aspx.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAged Careen
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.titleEfficacy of Normalisation of Advance Care Planning (NACP) for people with chronic diseases in hospital and community settings: a quasi-experimental studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-021-06928-wen
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34470636/en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesThe University of Newcastleen
dc.description.affiliatesWyong Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC Health Services Researchen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.