Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The social organisation of decision-making about intrapartum fetal monitoring: An Institutional Ethnography||Authors:||Small, Kirsten A;Sidebotham, Mary;Fenwick, Jennifer ;Gamble, Jenny||Affliation:||Central Coast Local Health District
|Issue Date:||17-Sep-2022||Source:||36(3):281-289||Journal title:||Women and Birth||Department:||Nursing & Midwifery Directorate||Abstract:||International guidelines recommend intrapartum cardiotocograph (CTG) monitoring for women at risk for poor perinatal outcome. Research has not previously addressed how midwives and obstetricians enable or hinder women's decision-making regarding intrapartum fetal monitoring and how this work is structured by external organising factors. To examine impacts of policy and research texts on midwives' and obstetricians' work with labouring women related to intrapartum fetal monitoring decision-making. We used a critical feminist qualitative methodology known as Institutional Ethnography (IE). The research was conducted in an Australian tertiary maternity service. Data collection included interviews, observation, and texts relating to midwives' and obstetricians' work with the fetal monitoring system. Textual mapping was used to explain how midwives' and obstetricians' work was organised to happen the way it was. CTG monitoring was initiated predominantly by midwives applying mandatory policy. Midwives described reluctance to inform labouring women that they had a choice of fetal monitoring method. Discursive approaches used in a national fetal surveillance guideline, a Cochrane systematic review, and the largest randomised controlled trial regarding CTG monitoring in labour generated and reproduced assumptions that clinicians, not labouring women, were the appropriate decision-maker regarding fetal monitoring in labour. Guidelines structured midwives' and obstetricians' work in a manner that undermined women's participation in decisions about fetal monitoring method. Intrapartum fetal monitoring guidelines should be critically reviewed to ensure they encourage and enable midwives and obstetricians to support women to make decisions about intrapartum care.||URI:||https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/2263||DOI:||10.1016/j.wombi.2022.09.004||Pubmed:||https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36127282||Publicaton type:||Journal Article||Keywords:||Nursing
Newborn and Infant
|Appears in Collections:||Nursing|
Show full item record
checked on Jun 9, 2023
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.