Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1013
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Christopheren
dc.contributor.otherTyler, M.K.en
dc.contributor.otherLiu, P.Z.en
dc.contributor.otherMcKenzie, D.R.en
dc.contributor.otherSuchowerska, N.en
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-07T02:50:27Zen
dc.date.available2017-09-07T02:50:27Zen
dc.date.issued2016-05en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 17, Issue 3, pp. 223-235en
dc.identifier.issn1526-9914en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1013en
dc.description.abstractFlattening filter-free (FFF) beams are becoming the preferred beam type for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR), as they enable an increase in dose rate and a decrease in treatment time. This work assesses the effects of the flattening filter on small field output factors for 6 MV beams generated by both Elekta and Varian linear accelerators, and determines differences between detector response in flattened (FF) and FFF beams. Relative output factors were measured with a range of detectors (diodes, ionization chambers, radiochromic film, and microDiamond) and referenced to the relative output factors measured with an air core fiber optic dosimeter (FOD), a scintillation dosimeter developed at Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney. Small field correction factors were generated for both FF and FFF beams. Diode measured detector response was compared with a recently published mathematical relation to predict diode response corrections in small fields. The effect of flattening filter removal on detector response was quantified using a ratio of relative detector responses in FFF and FF fields for the same field size. The removal of the flattening filter was found to have a small but measurable effect on ionization chamber response with maximum deviations of less than ±0.9% across all field sizes measured. Solid-state detectors showed an increased dependence on the flattening filter of up to ±1.6%. Measured diode response was within ±1.1% of the published mathematical relation for all fields up to 30 mm, independent of linac type and presence or absence of a flattening filter. For 6 MV beams, detector correction factors between FFF and FF beams are interchangeable for a linac between FF and FFF modes, providing that an additional uncertainty of up to ±1.6% is accepted. PACS number(s): 87.55.km, 87.56.bd, 87.56.Da.en
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen
dc.titleSmall field detector correction factors: effects of flattening filter for Elekta and Varian linear acceleratorsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6059en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28297327en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physicsen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Jan 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.