Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1439
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuckmaster, Adam-
dc.contributor.otherManley, B.J.-
dc.contributor.otherArnolda, G.R.B.-
dc.contributor.otherWright, I.M.R.-
dc.contributor.otherOwen, L.S.-
dc.contributor.otherFoster, J.P.-
dc.contributor.otherHuang, L.-
dc.contributor.otherRoberts, C.T.-
dc.contributor.otherClark, T.L.-
dc.contributor.otherFan, W.Q.-
dc.contributor.otherFang, A.Y.W.-
dc.contributor.otherMarshall, I.R.-
dc.contributor.otherPszczola, R.J.-
dc.contributor.otherDavis, P.G.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-04T23:21:12Zen
dc.date.available2019-06-04T23:21:12Zen
dc.date.issued2019-05-
dc.identifier.citation380(21):2031-2040en
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1439en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Nasal high-flow therapy is an alternative to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a means of respiratory support for newborn infants. The efficacy of high-flow therapy in nontertiary special care nurseries is unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial involving newborn infants (<24 hours of age; gestational age, >/=31 weeks) in special care nurseries in Australia. Newborn infants with respiratory distress and a birth weight of at least 1200 g were assigned to treatment with either high-flow therapy or CPAP. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 72 hours after randomization. Infants in whom high-flow therapy failed could receive CPAP. Noninferiority was determined by calculating the absolute difference in the risk of the primary outcome, with a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 754 infants (mean gestational age, 36.9 weeks, and mean birth weight, 2909 g) were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. Treatment failure occurred in 78 of 381 infants (20.5%) in the high-flow group and in 38 of 373 infants (10.2%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 10.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2 to 15.4). In a secondary per-protocol analysis, treatment failure occurred in 49 of 339 infants (14.5%) in the high-flow group and in 27 of 338 infants (8.0%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 6.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.7 to 11.2). The incidences of mechanical ventilation, transfer to a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit, and adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal high-flow therapy was not shown to be noninferior to CPAP and resulted in a significantly higher incidence of treatment failure than CPAP when used in nontertiary special care nurseries as early respiratory support for newborn infants with respiratory distress. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and Monash University; HUNTER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614001203640.).en
dc.description.sponsorshipPaediatricsen
dc.subjectPaediatricsen
dc.subjectPediatricsen
dc.subjectNewborn and Infanten
dc.subjectRespiratoryen
dc.titleNasal High-Flow Therapy for Newborn Infants in Special Care Nurseriesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa1812077en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31116919en
dc.description.affiliatesCentral Coast Local Health Districten
dc.description.affiliatesGosford Hospitalen
dc.identifier.journaltitleNew England Journal of Medicineen
dc.type.studyortrialRandomized Controlled Clinical Trial/Controlled Clinical Trialen
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics / Paediatrics
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

66
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.