Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Prevalence of advance care planning practices among people with chronic diseases in hospital and community settings: a retrospective medical record audit||Authors:||Barrett, Tomiko ;Cleasby, Peter;Jeong, S.;Ohr, S.O.;Davey, R.;David, M.||Affliation:||Central Coast Local Health District
The University of Newcastle
|Issue Date:||Apr-2021||Source:||21(1):303||Journal title:||BMC Health Services Research||Department:||Aged Care||Abstract:||BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables healthcare professionals to embrace the important process where patients think about their values in life and goals for health care, and discuss their future health care preferences with family members for a time when they are not able to make health care decisions. Despite the promotion of ACP last two decades, and well-known benefits of ACP and a written Advance Care Directive (ACD), they are still underutilised in Australia and across the world. Previous studies have provided some insights, however, an uptake of ACP and prevalence of ACDs in community settings is rarely reported. METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the uptake of ACP and prevalence of ACDs among people with chronic diseases in hospital and community settings. A retrospective medical record audit of eligible patients looking for evidence of ACP was conducted in 16 research sites in eight hospital and eight community care settings. Participants included those who were admitted to one of the research sites, and who were aged 18 years and over with at least one of nine nominated chronic diseases. The primary outcome measures included the number of patients with evidence of ACP through the following practices: completion of an ACD, appointment of an Enduring Guardian (EG), or completion of a resuscitation plan. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ACD was 2.8% (n = 28) out of 1006 audited records, and only 10 (1%) of them were legally binding. The number of EGs appointed was 39 (3.9%) across the sites. A total of 151 (15.4%) resuscitation plans were found across the eight hospital sites. 95% (n = 144) of the resuscitation plans indicated 'Not-for-resuscitation'. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of ACP is very low. Current medical recording system reveals the challenges in ACP lie in the process of storage, access and execution of the ACDs. Given that having an ACD or Enduring Guardian in place is only useful if the treating physician knows how and where to access the information, it has implications for policy, information system, and healthcare professionals' education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618001627246 ). The URL of the trial registry record http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial/MyTrial.aspx.||URI:||https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1959||DOI:||10.1186/s12913-021-06265-y||Pubmed:||https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33820535/||ISSN:||1472-6963||Publicaton type:||Journal Article||Keywords:||Research|
|Appears in Collections:||Health Service Research|
Show full item record
checked on Feb 3, 2023
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.