Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2080
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBack, Michael F-
dc.contributor.otherShakespeare, T.P.-
dc.contributor.otherMukherjee, R.K.-
dc.contributor.otherLu, J.J.-
dc.contributor.otherWynne, J.C.-
dc.contributor.otherKumar, M.B.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T04:33:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T04:33:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-06-
dc.identifier.citationVolume 48, Issue 2, pp.195-203en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/2080-
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen
dc.titleA comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed radiation oncology practice audit instruments: How does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01296.x.en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15230754/en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncologyen
dc.relation.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-8333en
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Mar 29, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.