Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBack, Michael-
dc.contributor.otherShakespeare, T.P.-
dc.contributor.otherLu, J.J.-
dc.contributor.otherWynne, C.J.-
dc.contributor.otherBloomfield, L.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-13T23:17:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-13T23:17:32Z-
dc.date.issued2004-07-
dc.identifier.citationVolume 59, Issue 4, pp. 1157 - 1162en
dc.identifier.urihttps://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/2083-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Our primary aim was to design a new, internationally accredited, comprehensive radiation oncology (RO) training program for Singaporean residents that satisfied the needs of stake holders and incorporated published evidence. Methods and materials: The evidence-based method included Medline literature review and broad-based training needs assessment. Results: Literature review revealed few studies describing or evaluating RO resident training programs. Our program was designed by incorporating available published research and stakeholder views determined by the training needs assessment. The program includes novel evidence-based educational methods, including individually negotiated learning contracts, a mentor program, logbooks, task-based learning, tutorials, and formative plus summative assessments. The content and structure is consistent with most United States, United Kingdom, and Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist (RANZCR) guidelines, with resident evaluation via RANZCR examinations. The RANZCR accredited the program in January 2002. Conclusion: We recommend institutions or countries introducing or revising RO resident training programs use an evidence-based approach, addressing the needs of stake holders (determined by a comprehensive training needs assessment) and incorporating published research. Novel educational methods may be considered in RO training. This new Singapore program is the first to achieve international accreditation by the RANZCR. It is clear that additional research in the design and evaluation of RO resident training programs is required.en
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.titleDesign of an internationally accredited radiation oncology resident training program incorporating novel educational modelsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.009en
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15234051/en
dc.identifier.journaltitleDesign of an internationally accredited radiation oncology resident training program incorporating novel educational modelsen
dc.relation.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-8333en
dc.originaltypeTexten
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Oncology / Cancer
Radiology
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Nov 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.