Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1/1316
Title: | Stroke units, tissue plasminogen activator, aspirin and neuroprotection: which stroke intervention could provide the greatest community benefit? | Authors: | Sturm, Jonathan ;Gilligan, A.K.;Thrift, A.G.;Dewey, H.M.;Macdonell, R.A.;Donnan, G.A. | Issue Date: | 2005 | Source: | Volume 20, Issue 4, pp. 239 - 244 | Journal title: | Cerebrovascular Diseases | Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Although a number of acute stroke interventions are of proven efficacy, there is uncertainty about their community benefits. We aimed to assess this within a defined population. METHODS: Eligibility for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), aspirin, stroke unit management and neuroprotection were assessed among incident stroke cases within the community-based North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study. RESULTS: Among 306,631 people, there were 645 incident strokes managed in hospital. When eligible patients were extrapolated to the Australian population, for every 1,000 cases, 46 (95% CI 17-69) could have been saved from death or dependency with stroke unit management, 6 (95% CI 1-11) by using aspirin, 11 (95% CI 5-17) or 10 (95% CI 3-16) by using tPA at 3 and 6 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although tPA is the most potent intervention, management in stroke units has the greatest population benefit and should be a priority. | URI: | https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1316 | DOI: | 10.1159/000087705 | Pubmed: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16123543 | ISSN: | 1015-9770 | Publicaton type: | Journal Article | Keywords: | Neurology Stroke |
Appears in Collections: | Neurology |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.