Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/1527
Title: ClosureFast endovenous radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous vein and small saphenous vein incompetence: Efficacy and anatomical failure patterns
Authors: Tomazini Martins, Rodrigo ;Rodriguez-Acevedo, O.;Elstner, K.E.;Martinic, K.;Ibrahim, R.I.;Arduini, F.;Ibrahim, N.
Affliation: Central Coast Local Health District
Gosford Hospital
Issue Date: May-2019
Source: 34(4):266-271
Journal title: Phlebology
Department: Neurology
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates and patterns after endovenous radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) are poorly documented. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and anatomical recurrence patterns of saphenous vein reflux after ERFA. METHOD: Two hundred patients previously treated with ERFA were recalled for clinical assessment and venous-duplex ultrasound at three years post-treatment. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (68F, 38M) with a mean age of 49.4 years (SD +11.5y) were assessed. Mean follow-up was 42.1 months (SD + 20.1m). Further varicose veins were identified in 31 patients (29.2%). Recanalization/recurrence/failure was diagnosed in 16 patients (15.1%), including 18 trunks (8.7%), 13 great saphenous vein (6.3%) and 5 small saphenous vein (2.4%). Twenty-seven patients (25%) developed neo-incompetence in 31 trunks and 12 non-saphenous veins. All patients with truncal recanalization had a body mass index > 29 (range 29-42). CONCLUSION: Disease progression was twice as high as the recanalization rate at three years post-treatment using ERFA in this study. Raised body mass index may be a contributing factor; however, further longitudinal studies are required. Patient self-selection bias may have also influenced our results.
URI: https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/1527
DOI: 10.1177/0268355518799609
Pubmed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208755
ISSN: 0268-3555
Publicaton type: Journal Article
Keywords: Research
Appears in Collections:Health Service Research

Show full item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on Feb 1, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.