Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1/2063
Title: An OxPLORE Initiative Evaluating Children's Surgery Resources Worldwide: A Cross-sectional Implementation of the OReCS Document
Authors: Hartley, Emma ;Ravi, K.;Killen, A.;Alexander, A.;Bell-Davies, F.;Biganiro Sebintu, J.;Brazeal, A.;Butoyi, J. M. V.;Diaz, F.E.;Drabile, R.;Fanny, M.;Fernie, L.;Gunawardana, S.;Hawu, Y.N.;Hendron, H.;Joseph, S.A.;Lamahewage, A.;Mahagedera, R.;Manirambona, E.;Morisho, B.K.;Muchunu, P.;Niyukuri, A.;Ntaganda, E.;Orliacq, F.;Orliacq, J.;Wobenjo, A.;Young, P.;Lakhoo, K.;Ford, K.
Affliation: Central Coast Local Health District
Issue Date: Nov-2021
Source: 46(3):476-485
Journal title: World Journal of Surgery
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Global Initiative for Children's Surgery (GICS) group produced the Optimal Resources for Children's Surgery (OReCS) document in 2019, listing standards of children's surgical care by level of healthcare facilities within low resource settings. We have previously created and piloted an audit tool based on the OReCS criteria in a high-income setting. In this study, we aimed to validate its use in identifying gaps in children's surgery provision worldwide. METHODS: Our OReCS audit tool was implemented in 10 hospitals providing children's surgery across eight countries. Collaborators were recruited via the Oxford Paediatrics Linking Our Research with Electives (OxPLORE) international network of medical students and trainees. The audit tool measured a hospital's current capacity for children's surgery. Data were analysed firstly to express the percentage of 'essential' criteria met for each specialty. Secondly, the 'OxPLORE method' was used to allocate each hospital specialty a level based on procedures performed and resources available. A User Evaluation Tool (UET) was developed to obtain feedback on the ease of use of the tool. RESULTS: The percentage of essential criteria met within each category varied widely between hospitals. The level given to hospitals for subspecialties based on OReCS criteria often did not reflect their self-defined level. The UET indicated the audit tool was practicable across multiple settings. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of the OReCS criteria to identify areas for local hospital improvement and inform national children's surgical plans. We have made informed suggestions to increase usability of the OReCS audit tool.
URI: https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/2063
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06377-w
Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34846547/
ISSN: 0364-2313
Publicaton type: Journal Article
Keywords: Paediatrics
Pediatrics
Surgery
Child
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics / Paediatrics

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Feb 1, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.