Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1/2080| Title: | A comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed radiation oncology practice audit instruments: How does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation? | Authors: | Back, Michael F ;Shakespeare, T.P.;Mukherjee, R.K.;Lu, J.J.;Wynne, J.C.;Kumar, M.B. | Issue Date: | Jun-2004 | Source: | Volume 48, Issue 2, pp.195-203 | Journal title: | Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | URI: | https://elibrary.cclhd.health.nsw.gov.au/cclhdjspui/handle/1/2080 | DOI: | 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01296.x. | Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15230754/ | Publicaton type: | Journal Article | Keywords: | Cancer Radiotherapy |
| Appears in Collections: | Oncology / Cancer |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.